Compare two data programs
Published terms side by side, taken from each organization's own pages. Missing terms are marked, not guessed.
Turing
View profileAnthroly
View profile- What they do
- Prepares company records at its own cost and licenses them to AI labs.
- Data lab that usually licenses records itself and sometimes brokers deals with AI labs.
- Organization type
- Intermediary
- Buyer and intermediary
- DataDeals Score: Public Program Transparency
- 88.5/100
- Not scored
- Data types
- Internal communications, CRM and sales, Customer support, Software engineering, Documents and SOPs, Projects and workflows, Design and product
- Internal communications, CRM and sales, Customer support, Finance and accounting, Software engineering, Documents and SOPs, Projects and workflows, Meetings and calls, Field and physical operations, Design and product
- Systems named
- Slack, Microsoft Teams, Microsoft 365, Salesforce, Jira, Confluence, GitHub, GitLab, Notion, Linear, Figma
- Slack, Microsoft Teams, Gmail, Outlook, Jira, QuickBooks, SAP
- Who qualifies
- Active, winding-down or closed businesses with years of operating history and authorized rights holder
- Only US-headquartered and US-operating companies per official site; records must be licensable
- Company size
- No minimum size published
- No minimum size published
- How you are paid
- Turing pays you a share of each sale to an AI lab, so you are paid only when a sale happens. Preparation costs are recovered from later sales rather than invoiced. The revenue split and payout timing are not published.
- Its indexed pages say it usually pays sellers as the contracting party, but sometimes brokers a direct deal with a lab instead. Its FAQ says there is no listing fee or seller commission. Payment timing could not be verified.
- Seller fees
- Preparation charged against later sales, not upfront seller invoice; actual revenue-split fraction private.
- Indexed official FAQ says no listing fee or seller commission; cannot inspect current full homepage directly.
- Payment timing
- Payment follows each downstream sale, but no precise payout window or buyer remittance disclosed.
- Payment timing/conditions and acceptance process not verifiable from accessible seller materials.
- Advertised compensation (not an offer)
- No universal public payout amount
- No universal seller range published
- Exclusivity
- License: Non-exclusive by defaultSelling mandate: Exclusive selling mandate
- License: not publicly specified
- Permitted AI use
- AI lab training datasets and derived RL/evaluation product licensing explicitly described.
- AI labs receive prepared materials; scope of sublicense and role-switching varies by deal and is not specified.
- Privacy
- Mutual NDA before samples, personal-data and secret removal, isolated processing, SOC 2 claim.
- Marketing discusses de-identification; linked privacy page pertains to an unrelated SEO service rather than dataset processing.
- Retention and deletion
- Opt out after 90 days, but post-license deletion and trained-model survival not public.
- Dataset retention/deletion and seller termination are not verified in an operative seller license.
- Last verified
- November 9, 2026
- November 9, 2026
DataDeals is free for sellers and may receive referral fees from buyers. Commercial relationships do not affect DataDeals Scores. How we score companies
