Compare two data programs
Published terms side by side, taken from each organization's own pages. Missing terms are marked, not guessed.
Anthroly
View profileTroveo
View profile- What they do
- Data lab that usually licenses records itself and sometimes brokers deals with AI labs.
- Matches company data with AI labs and licenses it on approved terms.
- Organization type
- Buyer and intermediary
- Marketplace
- DataDeals Score: Public Program Transparency
- Not scored
- 83.5/100
- Data types
- Internal communications, CRM and sales, Customer support, Finance and accounting, Software engineering, Documents and SOPs, Projects and workflows, Meetings and calls, Field and physical operations, Design and product
- Internal communications, CRM and sales, Customer support, Finance and accounting, Software engineering, Documents and SOPs, Projects and workflows, Meetings and calls, Field and physical operations
- Systems named
- Slack, Microsoft Teams, Gmail, Outlook, Jira, QuickBooks, SAP
- None named
- Who qualifies
- Only US-headquartered and US-operating companies per official site; records must be licensable
- Company owns and can authorize data licensing; no fixed minimum in report
- Company size
- No minimum size published
- No minimum size published
- How you are paid
- Its indexed pages say it usually pays sellers as the contracting party, but sometimes brokers a direct deal with a lab instead. Its FAQ says there is no listing fee or seller commission. Payment timing could not be verified.
- You receive a share of each sale of your data, including later enriched products. Troveo's retained percentage and payment dates are not published.
- Seller fees
- Indexed official FAQ says no listing fee or seller commission; cannot inspect current full homepage directly.
- Actual retained fee/percentage of onward license revenues not stated.
- Payment timing
- Payment timing/conditions and acceptance process not verifiable from accessible seller materials.
- Payments occur as each sale closes, but remittance trigger/date not given.
- Advertised compensation (not an offer)
- No universal seller range published
- Marketing says buyers pay six figures; prominent multi-sale example explicitly illustrative
- Exclusivity
- License: not publicly specified
- License: Negotiated per deal
- Permitted AI use
- AI labs receive prepared materials; scope of sublicense and role-switching varies by deal and is not specified.
- Source exports can become enriched datasets, feeds and performance products licensed to multiple buyers.
- Privacy
- Marketing discusses de-identification; linked privacy page pertains to an unrelated SEO service rather than dataset processing.
- Documented anonymization standard removing identifying people, clients and credentials.
- Retention and deletion
- Dataset retention/deletion and seller termination are not verified in an operative seller license.
- Terms are owner-approved; precise buyer deletion, post-term retention and audit rights not published.
- Last verified
- November 9, 2026
- November 9, 2026
DataDeals is free for sellers and may receive referral fees from buyers. Commercial relationships do not affect DataDeals Scores. How we score companies
