Compare two data programs
Published terms side by side, taken from each organization's own pages. Missing terms are marked, not guessed.
AfterQuery
View profileOoak Data
View profile- What they do
- Licenses company operating records for AI training and evaluation.
- Licenses company operating archives directly for frontier model training.
- Organization type
- Direct buyer
- Direct buyer
- DataDeals Score: Public Program Transparency
- 64/100
- 85.5/100
- Data types
- Internal communications, CRM and sales, Customer support, Finance and accounting, Software engineering, Projects and workflows
- Internal communications, CRM and sales, Customer support, Finance and accounting, Software engineering, Documents and SOPs, Projects and workflows
- Systems named
- None named
- None named
- Who qualifies
- Established companies with several teams, systems and years of history preferred; operating, winding down or closed companies welcome
- Broad business-system support; value depends on size, years of history, breadth of tools and data quality
- Company size
- No minimum size published
- No minimum size published
- How you are paid
- AfterQuery proposes a custom license price after reviewing a sample, based on systems, history, breadth and uniqueness. A payment step is described, but payment terms, fees and the paying entity are not published.
- Ooak licenses your records directly and pays the company after the work is done. The exact due date is not published.
- Seller fees
- No explicit seller fee or no-fee statement on program, intake or general site terms reviewed.
- Older official www page explicitly says no hidden fees or seller costs; current live host less specific.
- Payment timing
- Payment step exists, but no invoice, closing or acceptance trigger and no payment term are published.
- Current page says get paid after work; exact contractual acceptance date/payment due period not given.
- Advertised compensation (not an offer)
- No fixed public payout; form's expected-price bands are seller expectations
- Current page advertises up to $1M; an earlier indexed version said up to $300K. Neither is a typical or guaranteed payment.
- Exclusivity
- License: not publicly specified
- License: not publicly specified
- Permitted AI use
- Frontier AI training/evaluation is disclosed, but actual lab access and sublicense rights are not specific.
- Ooak anonymizes then prepares material for frontier models; only anonymized dataset retained for license term.
- Privacy
- Masking, exclusion of privileged/payroll/credentials, NDA and re-identification testing described.
- Own pipeline, no third-party raw archive access, PII stripped, sample review and rights check described.
- Retention and deletion
- No post-transfer raw or de-identified retention/deletion schedule or seller termination remedy located.
- Raw archive deletion within 30 days and written confirmation called contract obligation; seller picks exclusions.
- Last verified
- November 9, 2026
- November 9, 2026
DataDeals is free for sellers and may receive referral fees from buyers. Commercial relationships do not affect DataDeals Scores. How we score companies
